Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 vs HOKA One One Mafate

If you're looking for a long-distance trail running shoe that you can confidently use for ultras, both the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 and the HOKA Mafate X are strong contenders. But while both are suitable for that scenario, they have different philosophies that greatly influence how they feel while running.

🔶 Underfoot sensations: protection vs dynamism

The Xodus Ultra 4 is a shoe that, despite being designed for ultramarathons, surprises with its lightness and responsiveness . The PWRRUN PB foam (the same used in road racing shoes) offers a soft feel but with excellent energy return. This makes it a very dynamic option: perfect for runners who want to run fast even on long runs.

In contrast, the Mafate X feels more robust and cushioned. Its midsole is more voluminous and incorporates a Pebax plate that provides moderate rigidity, stability, and protection. Despite its good responsiveness, its priority is absorbing impact and protecting the legs from the wear and tear of many hours of running on rough terrain.

👉 If you're looking for lightness, agility and fluidity , the Xodus.
👉 If you prefer deep cushioning and safety on hard terrain , the Mafate.

🔷 Terrain and technique: How technical is your trail?

The sole also makes a big difference. The Xodus Ultra 4 has a PWRTRAC sole that performs well on most surfaces: dirt, rock, moderate mud, and hard-packed trails. Its lugs aren't too aggressive, making it more versatile if you combine mountain biking with groomed trails or liaison sections.

The Mafate X, meanwhile, features Vibram Megagrip with Litebase technology , providing superior grip , especially on technical, wet, or very uneven terrain. It's a shoe designed to maintain control even in challenging situations , such as steep descents with loose rocks or very rough trails.

👉 For varied or not overly technical terrain , the Xodus.
👉 For high mountain terrain, aggressive terrain or complicated conditions , the Mafate.

⚖️ Weight and muscle fatigue

The Xodus Ultra 4 is lighter, and that's noticeable on long runs if you're used to running in agile shoes. The feeling of freedom is greater, and that's appreciated when you want to maintain a steady pace without feeling weighed down.

The Mafate X , on the other hand, although slightly heavier, reduces muscle stress thanks to its foam volume and plate. It's not as responsive, but it provides better protection when your legs are tired in the second half of an ultra.

👉 Are you a light/fast runner? You'll like the Xodus more.
👉 Are you a runner of medium or large build, or prone to muscle fatigue? The Mafate will give you more protection.

👟 Fit and comfort

Both shoes offer a good fit, but with differences:

• The Xodus Ultra 4 has a very comfortable and ventilated upper, with a "runnable" shoe feel, closer to an asphalt shoe.

• The Mafate X features a more structured upper, with greater reinforcement and a feeling of security in technical areas .

👉 If you prioritize asphalt-like comfort and flexibility , the Xodus.
👉 If you value a more technical, closed and stable feel, the Mafate.

🏁 Conclusion: Which one to choose?

Choose the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 if:

• You want a lightweight, responsive, and versatile shoe that performs well on mixed terrain.

• You run ultras or long runs, but you maintain a lively pace .

• You like to feel the ground and wear a more natural shoe when running.

• You are a neutral runner, without great needs for extreme protection.

Choose the HOKA Mafate X if:

• You need maximum protection and stability to run for hours on technical mountain terrain.

• You prioritize grip, safety, and a more structured and protected stride.

• Are you of medium or large build, or do you have a history of muscle overload?

• Are you looking for a shoe for training or competitions in demanding mountain terrain ?